[SUBJECT FULL NAME] - Collection Map
OSINT-011 Source-of-Wealth Verification - collection workspace. Central topic = the wealth holder (subject). Branches = data-point categories for AML/KYC source-of-wealth verification. Drop each collected value as a child node; expand it with where it was found and how it was corroborated. Paste raw tool output into the node’s Notes. → feeds deliverable OSINT-011.
00 · Collection Plan - PIRs & EEIs
The questions this collection must answer + the essential elements of information (EEI) for each. Tick as satisfied. → drives §3 Source-of-Wealth Determination & KYC Recommendation, §4 PIRs, §13 Wealth-Narrative Reconciliation & Verified Findings, §15 Key Assumptions, Collection Gaps & RFIs.
PIR-1 - Origin: What are the material sources of the subject’s accumulated wealth, and are they lawful and documented?
- EEI: all asserted wealth streams named (business exits, compensation, inheritance, investments, RE, professional earnings)
- EEI: each stream’s approximate magnitude and period attributed
- EEI: primary or independent documentation exists for each material stream
- EEI: aggregate of substantiated streams plausibly accounts for apparent wealth
PIR-2 - Corroboration: Does independent evidence corroborate the claimed narrative, in substance and proportion?
- EEI: subject-provided documents cross-checked against independently obtainable records
- EEI: key wealth events (incorporation, sale, estate transfer) corroborated by official/primary source
- EEI: amounts attributed to each stream reconciled with observable asset footprint
- EEI: unexplained wealth gap (if any) quantified and flagged
PIR-3 - Funds: Where do the specific funds entering this relationship/transaction originate (SoF)?
- EEI: originating account/institution and jurisdiction identified
- EEI: payment route traced from origin to client relationship
- EEI: specific funds linked back to a substantiated §6 wealth stream
- EEI: third-party funding, opaque routing, or unlinked tranches flagged
PIR-4 - Concern: Is there any sanctions, PEP-corruption, fraud, tax-evasion, or other illicit-origin nexus?
- EEI: subject screened on OFAC SDN, OFSI, EU Consolidated, UN Consolidated (version dates recorded)
- EEI: PEP status determined (domestic / foreign / int’l-org / close associate or family)
- EEI: adverse media screen covering corruption, fraud, embezzlement, OCG, tax evasion, predicate offenses
- EEI: any sanctions-nexus entity in the holding/ownership chain identified
PIR-5 - Structure: Through what entities/trusts/jurisdictions is the wealth held, and do they obscure origin or control?
- EEI: all holding companies, trusts, foundations linked to subject mapped
- EEI: nominee or layered arrangements identified
- EEI: secrecy/high-risk jurisdiction involvement assessed
- EEI: ultimate beneficial ownership resolved for each structure
Collection gaps / RFIs (running)
- [open item - documentation withheld / closed-jurisdiction records] → route to Asset Tracing node (OSINT-021 / OSINT-023)
- [open item - PEP-family linkage unconfirmed] → escalate to EDD
- [open item]
01 · Target Identity (Wealth Holder)
Resolve the subject’s identity against the stated wealth narrative. Ambiguity here contaminates every downstream stream. → feeds §8 Subject Identity, PEP, Sanctions & Watchlist Screening, Appendix A Subject & Identifier Index.
Legal name & identifiers
- Full legal name:
- AKA / former names / transliterations:
- DOB / YOB:
- Place of birth:
- Nationality / citizenship(s):
- Residence (country / city):
- Tax domicile:
- National / passport ID (partial/redacted):
Identity resolution
- Identity resolution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible / Unresolved]
- Discriminating identifiers matched:
- Same-name candidates identified & excluded:
- Source of identity resolution (document / registry / biometric):
Cooperation basis
- Documentation received from subject: [Yes / Partial / None]
- Questionnaire / declaration completed:
- RM-sourced narrative:
- Mix / independence of evidence:
02 · Real Property
Immovable-asset holdings corroborated via land registries, property records, and observable listing data. → feeds §6 Source-of-Wealth Reconstruction & Corroboration (Real estate stream), §9 Associated Entities, §13 Wealth-Narrative Reconciliation.
Property holdings
Clone the block per property. Tools: national land registries, HM Land Registry, cadastral portals, PropertyShark, Zillow (US), Rightmove (UK), EPC register, Companies House charges register.
- [property - e.g. 12 Example St, London]
- Title / registration number:
- Jurisdiction / registry source:
- Owner of record (legal title):
- Subject’s beneficial interest / link:
- Purchase date / price on record:
- Mortgage / charge:
- Corroborates which SoW stream (§6):
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
- Notes / tool output:
- [property 2]
Gaps / properties not independently confirmed
- [address or description - claimed but not found in registry]
03 · Corporate Holdings & Business Interests
Every entity in which the subject holds/held an interest - the primary vehicle for business-exit SoW. → feeds §6 (Business ownership / exits stream), §9 Associated Entities, Trusts & Beneficial Interests, Appendix D Entity / Ownership & Trust Chart.
Operating / holding companies
Clone per entity. Tools: OpenCorporates, Companies House (UK), Delaware Division of Corporations, SEC EDGAR, national registries, GLEIF, Dun & Bradstreet, Bureau van Dijk / Orbis.
- [entity - e.g. Acme Holdings Ltd]
- Jurisdiction / reg number:
- Incorporation / dissolution dates:
- Subject’s role (director / shareholder / UBO):
- Equity stake (%) and period:
- Co-shareholders / co-directors:
- Revenue / valuation indicators (public filings):
- Relevant event (sale / liquidation / restructure + date):
- Corroborating documents (SPA, filing, Companies House):
- Corroborates which SoW stream (§6): [Business ownership / exits]
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
- Notes / tool output: ← OpenCorporates, Companies House, SEC EDGAR
- [entity 2]
Exit / transaction evidence
Clone per transaction.
- [transaction - e.g. sale of Acme Holdings, 20XX]
- Buyer:
- Stated sale price / consideration:
- Primary corroboration (SPA, press release, Companies House transfer, public filing):
- Escrowed / structured payments:
- Corroboration grade:
- Notes:
- [transaction 2]
04 · Financial Accounts & Instruments
Accounts, portfolios, and instruments through which wealth is held or transacted - the source-of-funds tracing layer. → feeds §7 Source-of-Funds (Transaction / Relationship), §6 (Investments / capital markets stream), Appendix B Wealth-Source Register.
Declared accounts / institutions
- [institution + account type - e.g. Bank of X, current account]
- Jurisdiction:
- Account holder of record:
- Period active:
- Linked to which SoW stream:
- Supporting documentation offered:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
Investment / brokerage portfolios
- [platform / custodian]
- Asset classes held:
- Approximate value / period:
- Linked to which SoW stream:
- Notes:
Specific funds / tranches entering this relationship
SoF tracing - clone per tranche.
- [tranche - e.g. £2 m wire, 20XX-MM-DD]
- Originating account / institution:
- Originating jurisdiction:
- Payment route (intermediaries):
- Linked to which §6 SoW stream:
- Concern / flag:
- Notes / SWIFT / payment records:
- [tranche 2]
05 · Movable Assets
High-value movable assets observable via OSINT (registration records, AIS/FR24, social media, filings). → feeds §6 (Real estate / other earnings context), §13 Reconciliation (unexplained wealth gap check).
Vehicles
Tools: DVLA (UK), NMVTIS (US), state DMV records, plate searches.
- [vehicle - e.g. 2022 Range Rover]
- Plate / VIN:
- Registered owner:
- Source:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Notes:
Vessels
Tools: Lloyd’s List Intelligence, MarineTraffic, USCG NVDC, Flag-state registries.
- [vessel - e.g. M/Y Example]
- IMO / MMSI:
- Registered owner:
- Flag / jurisdiction:
- Notes / AIS screenshot:
Aircraft
Tools: FAA Registry (US), UK CAA G-INFO, ICAO registry, FlightAware, FlightRadar24.
- [aircraft - e.g. G-EXMP Cessna 560]
- Registration:
- Owner of record:
- Flag:
- Notes:
Art / luxury / collectibles (observable)
- [item]:
- Source of observation:
- Estimated value (if public):
06 · Cryptocurrency & Digital Assets
Crypto holdings identifiable via OSINT - wallet addresses declared or linked, on-chain observable flows. → feeds §6 (Investments stream), §7 Source-of-Funds (if crypto used in relationship), §14 Red Flags (if mixing / obfuscation).
Declared / identified wallets
Clone per wallet. Tools: blockchain explorers (Etherscan, Blockchair, Mempool.space), Chainalysis-style clustering heuristics (where licensed), OSINT wallet-discovery via profile/forum mentions.
- [wallet address - e.g. 0xABC…]
- Chain / asset:
- Approximate balance / tx volume:
- First / last seen:
- Linkage to subject (how attributed):
- Notable counterparties / clusters:
- Mixer / tumbler / DEX obfuscation indicators:
- Corroborates or conflicts with SoW narrative:
- Notes / explorer output:
- [wallet 2]
Exchange accounts (declared or observed)
- [exchange - e.g. Coinbase, Binance]
- KYC status (if disclosed):
- Linked to subject:
- Jurisdiction:
- Notes:
07 · Income & Source of Wealth - Narrative Reconstruction
The wealth-stream evidence layer - the analytic core feeding §6 Source-of-Wealth Reconstruction & Corroboration and §13 Wealth-Narrative Reconciliation. One sub-block per claimed stream.
Business ownership / exits
- Claimed:
- Company name + jurisdiction:
- Subject’s equity stake & period:
- Exit event (sale / IPO / liquidation + date):
- Claimed proceeds / magnitude:
- Primary corroboration (SPA / public filing / press release):
- Independent corroboration source & grade:
- Magnitude plausibility: [Plausible / Partial / Gap]
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Notes:
Employment / executive compensation
- Claimed:
- Employer / role / period:
- Claimed compensation (salary + bonus + equity + deferred):
- Corroborating records (pay slips, stock-option grants, public filings, P60/tax records):
- Independent corroboration source & grade:
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Notes:
Inheritance / family wealth / gifts
- Claimed:
- Decedent / donor:
- Estate / gift amount:
- Jurisdiction of estate:
- Corroborating records (probate, grant of representation, deed of gift):
- Independent corroboration source & grade:
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Notes:
Investments / capital markets
- Claimed:
- Portfolio / fund / instrument:
- Gains / distributions claimed:
- Period:
- Corroborating records (brokerage statements, fund valuations, tax returns):
- Independent corroboration source & grade:
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Notes:
Real estate gains
- Claimed:
- Property + jurisdiction:
- Purchase / sale prices:
- Net gain claimed:
- Corroborating records (land-registry transfer, title deed, conveyancing docs):
- Independent corroboration source & grade:
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Notes:
Professional practice / other earnings
- Claimed:
- Nature of earnings:
- Period and magnitude:
- Corroborating records:
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Notes:
Unexplained wealth gap (running total)
- Estimated total apparent wealth:
- Sum of substantiated streams:
- Unexplained residual:
- Significance / red-flag status:
08 · Liabilities & Encumbrances
Observed or declared obligations that bear on net wealth and may reveal financial stress or creditor risk. → feeds §11 Litigation, Regulatory & Tax-Integrity History, §14 Red Flags.
Mortgages / charges on property
- [property / lender]:
- Balance outstanding (if public):
- Registry source:
Liens / judgments (public records)
- [matter]
- Jurisdiction / court:
- Amount / status:
- Materiality to SoW:
- Source:
Bankruptcy / insolvency (personal or entity-level)
- [filing]
- Date / status / discharge:
- Jurisdiction:
- Source:
Tax disputes / HMRC / IRS notices (publicly observable)
- [matter]:
- Status:
- Source:
09 · Hidden / Nominee Structures
Opacity indicators - layered holding, secrecy jurisdictions, nominee arrangements that may defeat SoW tracing. → feeds §9 Associated Entities, Trusts & Beneficial Interests, §14 Red Flags & Illicit-Origin Indicators.
Trusts / foundations
Clone per structure. Tools: national trust/foundation registers, leaked-data sets (ICIJ Offshore Leaks DB), beneficial-ownership registers (where available).
- [structure name / ref]
- Type: [Discretionary trust / Foundation / Other]
- Jurisdiction:
- Trustee(s):
- Stated beneficiaries:
- Subject’s role (settlor / beneficiary / protector):
- Assets held (claimed / observable):
- Opacity / flag:
- Corroborates or obscures which SoW stream:
- Notes / ICIJ / registry output:
- [structure 2]
Offshore / secrecy-jurisdiction entities
Tools: ICIJ Offshore Leaks, OpenCorporates, Panama/Pandora/Paradise Papers search.
- [entity + jurisdiction]
- Role (holding / nominee / SPV):
- Link to subject:
- Flag (FATF grey-list / secrecy index):
- Notes:
Nominee arrangements observed
- [indicator]:
- Nature (nominee director / shareholder):
- Evidence:
10 · Network & Facilitators
Associates, intermediaries, and facilitators whose relationships bear on the wealth narrative or raise concern - PEP relatives, known lawyers / accountants (professional enablers), or co-investors. → feeds §9 Associated Entities, §8 Screening, §14 Red Flags.
PEP-linked associates / family
Clone per associate.
- [name]
- Relationship to subject:
- PEP basis (role / jurisdiction):
- Shared entity / asset:
- Concern:
- Screened (lists / result):
- Notes:
- [name 2]
Professional facilitators (lawyers, accountants, corporate-service providers)
Clone per facilitator.
- [name / firm]
- Role in wealth structures:
- Jurisdiction:
- Adverse history:
- Notes:
- [facilitator 2]
Co-investors / business partners
- [name]
- Shared entity / deal:
- Screened:
- Notes:
11 · Sanctions, PEP & Watchlist Screening
Structured screening layer for subject and all linked persons/entities. Every potential match is a pending match until dispositioned with discriminating identifiers. → feeds §8 Subject Identity, PEP, Sanctions & Watchlist Screening, Appendix E Screening-Hit Log.
Subject screening
- OFAC SDN / Consolidated (version date): [No match / Potential / Confirmed]
- Hit disposition:
- Discriminating identifiers used:
- OFSI / HM Treasury (version date):
- EU Consolidated (version date):
- UN Consolidated (version date):
- PEP databases (dataset + date):
- PEP status: [Not PEP / Domestic / Foreign / Int’l-org / Close associate or family]
- Basis of PEP determination:
- Other lists screened (FinCEN 311 / BIS / SECO / AUSTRAC):
Associated entity screening
Clone per entity screened.
- [entity name]
- Lists screened:
- Result: [No match / Potential / Confirmed]
- Disposition:
- Notes:
- [entity 2]
12 · Adverse Media & Illicit-Origin Indicators
Targeted adverse-media search covering corruption, fraud, embezzlement, OCG nexus, sanctions evasion, tax evasion, market abuse, predicate offenses. → feeds §10 Adverse Media & Illicit-Origin Indicators, §14 Red Flags.
Adverse media hits
Clone per item. Sources: Dow Jones / World-Check / LexisNexis Diligence (where licensed), Google News, Factiva, national newspaper archives; note language and jurisdiction coverage limits.
- [outlet + date + headline]
- Theme: [Corruption / Fraud / OCG / Sanctions / Tax / Other]
- Subject / entity named:
- Substantiation level: [Substantiated / Reported / Rumour]
- Source reliability (A–F):
- Materiality to SoW determination:
- Notes:
- [item 2]
Illicit-origin indicator checklist (running)
- Wealth generated through public office / PEP role without plausible legitimate compensation
- Unexplained wealth gap exceeding materiality threshold
- Opaque / layered structures defeating tracing
- Funds routed through secrecy or high-risk FATF jurisdiction without plausible explanation
- Asset values inconsistent with disclosed career / compensation history
- Predicate-offense conviction or civil judgment for fraud / corruption
- Sanctions nexus (direct or entity in ownership chain)
- Cryptocurrency obfuscation (mixing, privacy coins, chain-hop)
- Documentation withheld, inconsistent, or apparently fabricated
13 · Geographic & Jurisdictional Risk
Assess each jurisdiction where wealth was generated and/or is held. High-risk or secrecy jurisdictions raise the evidentiary bar. → feeds §12 Geographic & Jurisdictional Risk, §16 Source-of-Wealth Risk Matrix.
Jurisdictions in scope
Clone per jurisdiction.
- [jurisdiction - e.g. British Virgin Islands]
- Role: [Origin / Holding / Routing / Transit]
- CPI score / rank (year):
- FATF status (member / grey-list / black-list / third-country high-risk):
- Financial Secrecy Index score (year):
- Sanctions regime active:
- Risk weighting: [L / M / H]
- Impact on evidentiary bar:
- Notes:
- [jurisdiction 2]
14 · Litigation, Regulatory & Tax-Integrity
Legal history bearing on the lawful origin and integrity of the wealth - fraud judgments, disgorgement orders, UWOs, asset-forfeiture, tax-evasion findings. → feeds §11 Litigation, Regulatory & Tax-Integrity History, §14 Red Flags.
Civil / criminal litigation
Clone per matter.
- [matter / case reference]
- Forum / date:
- Status: [Pending / Settled / Judgment]
- Role (claimant / defendant):
- Materiality to SoW:
- Source grade:
- Notes:
- [matter 2]
Regulatory / enforcement actions
- [authority + matter]
- Date / outcome:
- Fine / disgorgement:
- Notes:
Unexplained-wealth orders / asset-forfeiture
- [jurisdiction + matter]:
- Status:
- Assets frozen / forfeited:
Tax dispute / evasion (public / observable)
- [matter]:
- Jurisdiction / authority:
- Status / outcome:
99 · Collection Admin
Working audit trail - not a deliverable section. Records the evidence base supporting the §17 Annex A Sources & Methodology and Appendix F Full Source Register.
Source register
Every material datum traceable to a graded source. Grade using Admiralty two-axis code (A–F reliability / 1–6 credibility).
- [S-1 - source name]
- Type: [Primary / Secondary / Tertiary / Subject-provided]
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
- Date accessed:
- Notes (scope / limitations):
- [S-2]
Document schedule (Appendix C mirror)
Every document relied on - corroborate provenance before grading.
- [DOC-01 - document name]
- Provenance: [Subject-provided / Independently obtained]
- Authentication status: [Verified / Unverified / Queried]
- Date:
- Hash / reference:
- [DOC-02]
Evidence archive
- [screenshot / capture ref + hash + URL + timestamp]:
Wealth-narrative reconciliation ledger (running)
- Stream: | Claimed: | Corroborated: [Y/Partial/N] | Variance: | Status:
Red-flag register (running)
- RF-01: | Severity: [Crit/High/Med/Low] | Dimension (§): | Disposition: [Open / Mitigable / Disqualifying]
Risk matrix (working)
- Illicit-origin likelihood (1–5):
- Materiality / exposure (1–5):
- Residual score (1–25):
- Band: [Low 1–5 / Moderate 6–10 / Elevated 11–15 / High 16–20 / Critical 21–25]
- Governing dimension: