OSINT-037 Strategic Forecast & Estimate - Collection Map
OSINT-037 Strategic Forecast & Estimate - collection workspace. Central topic = the forecast question set / strategic situation being assessed. Branches = the data-point categories for this strategic forecast. Drop each collected datum as a child node; expand it with the source, date accessed, and what it implies for the relevant forecast question. Paste raw tool output into the node’s Notes. → feeds deliverable OSINT-037.
00 · Collection Plan - PIRs & EEIs
The questions this collection must answer + the essential elements of information (EEI) for each. Tick as satisfied. → drives §3 Key Judgments, §4 Forecasting Questions & PIRs, §8 The Forecast (Calibrated Outcome Set), §10 Signposts & Warning Indicators, §15 Collection Gaps & RFIs.
FQ-1 - Primary forecast question (will [event/outcome] occur by [date]?)
- EEI: current state of the primary driver most influencing this question
- EEI: historical base rate from the reference class (how often did comparable cases resolve this way?)
- EEI: observable confirming signposts present / absent at collection date
- EEI: observable disconfirming signposts present / absent at collection date
- EEI: actor behavior / policy signals bearing on this question
FQ-2 - Second forecast question
- EEI: driver state and trajectory relevant to FQ-2
- EEI: reference-class base rate for FQ-2
- EEI: leading indicators specific to FQ-2
FQ-3 - Third forecast question
- EEI: driver state relevant to FQ-3
- EEI: base rate and comparison cases for FQ-3
PIR-A - Driver intelligence (§6 Strategic Drivers & Trends)
- EEI: current state and measurable trajectory of each key structural driver
- EEI: current state and measurable trajectory of each proximate driver
- EEI: driver interaction (reinforcing, offsetting, conditional) - documented evidence
- EEI: rate of change signals (economic data, polling, indicators, official statistics, events)
PIR-B - Base-rate / reference-class intelligence (§7 Reference Class & Base Rates)
- EEI: identified reference class(es) with n≥5 comparable past cases
- EEI: historical base rate (outcome frequency) within each reference class
- EEI: quality / limits of comparison (analogical validity, sample size, era)
- EEI: source for base-rate data (conflict datasets, election databases, economic series, etc.)
PIR-C - Signpost / warning indicator intelligence (§10 Signposts & Warning Indicators)
- EEI: each signpost from §10 - present / emerging / absent at collection date
- EEI: lead-time estimate for each high-priority signpost
- EEI: new potential signposts surfaced during collection not yet in §10
PIR-D - Alternative outcomes & wildcard intelligence (§9)
- EEI: evidence bearing on the principal alternative outcome
- EEI: signals for any low-probability / high-impact wildcard or discontinuity
- EEI: whether conditions for a full Scenario Analysis (OSINT-038) are warranted
Collection gaps / RFIs (running)
- [gap: base-rate source unavailable] → escalate to OSINT-029 Intelligence Estimate
- [gap: signpost not currently observable] → route to OSINT-040 I&W Program
- [gap: driver state contested] → cross-check against OSINT-026 Country / Regional Study
- [open item]
01 · Drivers & Key Variables
The forces shaping how the situation will develop. Collect evidence for each driver’s current state and trajectory - these anchor the §6 driver table and the §8 probabilities. Distinguish structural (slow-moving) from proximate (fast-moving) drivers. → feeds §6 Strategic Drivers & Trends, §8 The Forecast (Calibrated Outcome Set).
Structural drivers
Long-horizon, slow-moving forces. Collect trend data, official statistics, academic / institutional reporting. Grade each source (A–F/1–6). → §6 driver table, rows with Type = Structural.
- [structural driver - e.g. demographic / economic / institutional / geopolitical trend]
- Current state (measured):
- Trajectory (direction + rate): [↑ / → / ↓ + pace]
- Evidence / data source:
- Time horizon over which it shapes outcomes:
- Interactions with other drivers:
- Forecast relevance: [Dominant / Significant / Marginal]
- Uncertainty: [High / Med / Low]
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Source grade (A–F/1–6):
- Notes / tool output:
- [structural driver 2]
Proximate drivers
Fast-moving, near-term forces. Collect current-event data, policy announcements, market signals, leadership decisions, conflict incident data. → §6 driver table, rows with Type = Proximate.
- [proximate driver - e.g. policy decision, leadership change, conflict escalation, market event]
- Current state:
- Trajectory: [↑ / → / ↓]
- Evidence / event:
- Interaction with structural drivers:
- Forecast relevance: [Dominant / Significant / Marginal]
- Uncertainty: [High / Med / Low]
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Source grade (A–F/1–6):
- Notes / tool output:
- [proximate driver 2]
Driver interaction synthesis
- [Reinforcing pair - driver A × driver B]:
- [Offsetting pair - driver A dampens driver B]:
- [Conditional interaction - driver A matters only if driver B exceeds threshold]:
02 · Indicators & Warnings
Observable, monitorable signposts that confirm or disconfirm each forecast path. Each indicator is a separate clonable block. Collect current status, lead-time estimate, and direction of probability change. These seed §10 Signposts & Warning Indicators and hand off to OSINT-040 I&W Program. → feeds §10, Appendix D Signpost & Warning Matrix.
Confirming indicators (would raise central-forecast probability)
→ §10, disposition: Watch / Notify client / Re-forecast. Clone per signpost.
- [signpost - e.g. observable event, metric threshold, policy action, statement]
- Forecast question it bears on: [FQ-1 / FQ-2 / FQ-3]
- Probability change if observed: [e.g. FQ-1: 55%→75%]
- Lead time:
- Current status: [Not present / Emerging / Present]
- Source / where to monitor:
- Disposition: [Watch / Notify client / Re-forecast / Route to OSINT-040 I&W]
- Notes / tool output:
- [signpost 2]
Disconfirming indicators (would lower central-forecast probability)
→ §10. A disconfirming signpost lowers the probability of the central forecast.
- [signpost - e.g. non-event, reversal, policy contradiction]
- Forecast question it bears on: [FQ-1 / FQ-2 / FQ-3]
- Probability change if observed: [e.g. FQ-1: 55%→35%]
- Lead time:
- Current status: [Not present / Emerging / Present]
- Source / where to monitor:
- Disposition: [Watch / Route to OSINT-040 I&W]
- Notes / tool output:
- [signpost 2]
Wildcard / discontinuity tripwires
Low-probability, high-impact signals that would invalidate the forecast. → §9 wildcards.
- [tripwire - e.g. exogenous shock, black-swan indicator]
- Type: [Discontinuity / Black-swan-adjacent / Wildcard]
- Estimated probability: [<5% / <10%]
- Impact if triggered: [Crit / High / Mod]
- Current status: [Absent / Trace signal]
- Notes:
03 · Scenarios / Hypotheses
The central forecast and its plausible alternatives, for ACH and premortem. Collect evidence that confirms, disconfirms, or is neutral to each hypothesis. → feeds §8 The Forecast, §9 Alternative Outcomes, §12 ACH, §14 Premortem.
Central forecast - most likely outcome
- Forecast question: [FQ-1 / FQ-2 / FQ-3]
- Hypothesis label: [H1 - e.g. Outcome A obtains by [date]]
- Evidence FOR (consistent - C):
- [evidence item]:
- [evidence item 2]:
- Evidence AGAINST (inconsistent - I):
- [evidence item]:
- Neutral evidence (N):
- [evidence item]:
- Current point probability:
- Range:
- ICD 203 band:
- Analytic confidence: [H/M/L]
- Notes:
Principal alternative outcome
- Hypothesis label: [H2 - e.g. Outcome B obtains / timeline slips / magnitude reduced]
- Evidence FOR (C):
- [evidence item]:
- Evidence AGAINST (I):
- [evidence item]:
- Estimated probability:
- Impact if it occurs:
- Leading indicators specific to H2:
- Notes:
Additional alternative / wildcard
- Hypothesis label: [H3 - e.g. discontinuity / exogenous shock]
- Evidence FOR (C):
- [evidence item]:
- Estimated probability: [e.g. <5%]
- Impact: [Crit / High]
- Notes:
Key Assumptions Check (KAC) items
Assumptions underpinning the forecast - collected evidence for/against each. → §13 KAC.
- [assumption - e.g. reference class is genuinely comparable]
- Basis / evidence:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Impact on forecast if wrong:
- Linchpin?: [Y/N]
- Notes:
- [assumption - dominant driver continues current trajectory]
- Basis / evidence:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Impact:
- Linchpin?: [Y/N]
- [assumption - no major exogenous shock intervenes within horizon]
- Basis / evidence:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Impact:
- Linchpin?: [Y/N]
Premortem failure modes
Imagine the central forecast was badly wrong at resolution date. → §14 Premortem.
- [failure mode - what most plausibly caused the miss]
- Assumption / driver that broke:
- Likely bias: [Anchoring / Confirmation / Base-rate neglect / Recency / Optimism]
- Corrective / early catch (feeds back to §10):
04 · Data Sources & Feeds
Every material source type - institutional, statistical, media, dataset, human - with cadence, reliability grade, and access route. Clone per source. → feeds §17 Annex A - Sources & Methodology, Appendix H Full Source Register.
Institutional / official sources
National statistics agencies, government portals, international organization databases. Tools: direct agency portal scrape, UN/World Bank/IMF data APIs, Freedom of Information requests.
- [institution / dataset - e.g. UN Comtrade / national statistics office / central bank]
- Type: [Primary official / Secondary official]
- Coverage scope:
- As-of date / cadence:
- Self-interest / reliability caveat:
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
- Access URL / route:
- Notes / tool output:
- [institution 2]
Conflict / political event datasets
For base-rate and reference-class collection. Tools: ACLED, Uppsala UCDP, GDELT, ICEWS, V-Dem, Polity, PRS Group, Economist Intelligence Unit, Crisis Group, IISS, Jane’s, SIPRI.
- [dataset - e.g. ACLED / UCDP / V-Dem / Polity5 / GDELT]
- Cadence / currency:
- Reference class supported:
- Base rate derivation from this dataset:
- Reliability (A–F) / Credibility (1–6):
- Access route / licence:
- Notes:
- [dataset 2]
Economic / financial data feeds
Tools: World Bank Open Data, IMF WEO/IFS, BIS, central bank portals, Bloomberg/Refinitiv (where licenced), FRED, Trading Economics, Eurostat.
- [feed - e.g. IMF WEO / World Bank Databank / central bank portal]
- Metric / series:
- Cadence:
- Reliability (A–F) / Credibility (1–6):
- Notes:
- [feed 2]
Open-source news & media feeds
Tools: Feedly, GDELT GKG, Google News API, RSS aggregation, Nexis/Factiva (licenced), OSINT search operators (site:, filetype:, date:).
- [outlet / feed - e.g. Reuters / AP / regional outlet / aggregator]
- Coverage:
- Cadence:
- Self-interest / state-control caveat:
- Reliability (A–F) / Credibility (1–6):
- Notes:
- [outlet 2]
Academic / think-tank / institutional reporting
Tools: Google Scholar, JSTOR, SSRN, Brookings, RAND, Chatham House, IISS, ICG, CSIS, SWP, ECFR, CFR, regional area-studies journals.
- [publication / institution]
- Relevance to forecast:
- Cadence:
- Reliability (A–F) / Credibility (1–6):
- Notes:
Forecasting / prediction aggregators
Tools: Good Judgment Open, Metaculus, Manifold Markets, Polymarket (prices as market signal, not ground truth); Superforecaster consensus as calibration cross-check.
- [platform - e.g. Metaculus / Good Judgment Open / Manifold]
- Question URL:
- Current community probability:
- Resolution criteria:
- Cadence / last updated:
- Notes / deviation from internal forecast:
- [platform 2]
Human / in-country sourcing (where commissioned)
Tools: analyst network, in-country correspondents, expert interview, Track-II contacts.
- [source type / designator - never name if sensitive]
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
- Basis of reliability assessment:
- Notes:
05 · Key Actors & Entities
The actors whose decisions, behavior, or capacity most shape the forecast outcomes. Clone per actor. → feeds §6 Strategic Drivers (actor as proximate driver), §9 Alternative Outcomes, §10 Signposts (actor behavior as signpost). ★ recursive block.
State / government actors
Tools: government portals, Hansard / congressional records, official statements, diplomatic cables (public), Wikileaks (lawfully released), FOIA releases; OpenCorporates for state-owned enterprises.
- [actor - e.g. government, ministry, ruling party, central bank, military command]
- Role in forecast:
- Current posture / stated position:
- Trajectory / trend in behavior:
- Decision levers they hold relevant to FQ-1/2/3:
- Constraints on their action:
- Signpost: what actor behavior would confirm forecast path:
- Signpost: what actor behavior would disconfirm:
- Source / basis:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Notes / tool output:
- [actor 2]
Non-state actors
Opposition groups, armed groups, civil society, major corporations, multilateral bodies, IFIs. Tools: NGO databases, UN Panel of Experts reports, OFAC/EU sanctions lists, company registries.
- [actor - e.g. opposition party, armed faction, IGO, major firm, lobby]
- Role in forecast:
- Current posture:
- Trajectory:
- Constraints:
- Signpost (confirming):
- Signpost (disconfirming):
- Source / basis:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Notes / tool output:
- [actor 2]
External / third-party actors
Foreign states, international institutions, transnational actors whose intervention could move forecast probabilities (wildcards or major factors).
- [actor - e.g. foreign power, multilateral institution, diaspora network]
- Stake in outcome:
- Likely posture / intervention vector:
- Evidence of current activity:
- Probability impact if they act:
- Source:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Notes:
06 · Events Timeline
Chronological record of events, policy decisions, and milestones that bear on the drivers, signposts, or forecast questions. Clone per event. → feeds §6 Strategic Drivers, §10 Signposts, §11 Key Findings Summary, Appendix G Time-Phasing Chart. ★ recursive block.
Past events (pre-collection date)
Events that establish baseline, reference-class cases, or driver trajectory.
- [event - date + brief description]
- Date:
- Description:
- Bearing on: [driver / signpost / reference class / alternative outcome]
- Forecast question affected: [FQ-1 / FQ-2 / FQ-3]
- Significance:
- Source:
- Source grade (A–F/1–6):
- Notes:
- [event 2]
Current-period events (within collection window)
- [event - date + brief description]
- Date:
- Description:
- Bearing on: [driver / signpost / forecast probability]
- Probability impact: [FQ-1 moves from X% to Y% because…]
- Source:
- Source grade (A–F/1–6):
- Notes:
- [event 2]
Scheduled / anticipated future events (within forecast horizon)
Elections, summits, contract renewals, fiscal years, leadership transitions, legal deadlines. These are potential signposts or resolution-date anchors.
- [anticipated event - expected date + type]
- Expected date:
- Type: [Election / Summit / Deadline / Leadership transition / Economic release]
- Forecast question affected: [FQ-1 / FQ-2 / FQ-3]
- Scenario implication:
- Source / basis for timing:
- Notes:
- [anticipated event 2]
07 · Assumptions & Uncertainties
The analytic and evidentiary assumptions underpinning the forecast, and the irreducible uncertainties that widen the probability range. → feeds §5 Forecast Framing & Methodology, §13 Key Assumptions Check, §14 Premortem / Red-Team Check, §17 Annex A methodology statement.
Reference-class assumptions
- [assumption - e.g. reference class genuinely comparable to this case]
- Basis / evidence:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Impact on forecast if wrong:
- Linchpin?: [Y/N]
- Notes:
Driver-continuity assumptions
- [assumption - e.g. dominant driver continues current trajectory through horizon]
- Basis:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Impact if wrong:
- Linchpin?: [Y/N]
- Notes:
Exogenous-shock assumptions
- [assumption - e.g. no major exogenous shock within horizon]
- Basis:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Impact if wrong:
- Linchpin?: [Y/N]
- Notes:
Data / base-rate quality limitations
- [limitation - e.g. reference class small, base rate fragile]
- Nature of limitation:
- Effect on range (does it widen the range?):
- Mitigation:
- Notes:
Reflexivity / model uncertainty
- [reflexivity concern - e.g. forecast publication or client action could alter outcome]
- Nature:
- Assessed probability that reflexivity materially distorts:
- Mitigation:
Bias audit
Structured check before finalising §8 probabilities.
- Anchoring: [Were initial probabilities adjusted sufficiently away from the anchor?]:
- Confirmation bias: [Was disconfirming evidence genuinely weighed?]:
- Base-rate neglect: [Was the outside view applied before the inside view?]:
- Recency bias: [Were current vivid events over-weighted vs. base rate?]:
- Optimism / pessimism: [Was the range widened appropriately for uncertainty?]:
99 · Collection Admin
Working register - audit trail behind the deliverable. Not a deliverable section.
Source register
Every material datum traceable to a graded source. Admiralty two-axis code (A–F / 1–6).
- [S-1 - source name / designator]
- Type: [Primary official / Secondary / Tertiary / Dataset / HUMINT]
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
- Date accessed:
- Coverage scope:
- Self-interest / caveat:
- [S-2]
- [S-3]
Evidence archive
- [capture ref + hash + URL + timestamp + description]:
Forecast question register (working)
Mirrors §4 / Appendix A in the deliverable. Track current probabilities here during collection.
- [FQ-1 - resolvable question text]
- Resolution criteria:
- Resolution date:
- Current probability (working):
- Range:
- ICD 203 band:
- Analytic confidence: [H/M/L]
- Last updated:
- [FQ-2]
- [FQ-3]
Open gaps / RFIs (running)
- [base-rate source gap - pending] → OSINT-029 Intelligence Estimate
- [signpost not observable - standing watch needed] → OSINT-040 I&W Program
- [driver state contested - corroboration needed] → OSINT-026 Country / Regional Study
- [full alternative-futures set warranted] → OSINT-038 Scenario / Alternative Futures Analysis
- [weak-signal sweep needed] → OSINT-039 Horizon Scan / Emerging Threats Report
- [live tracking / scoring surface needed] → OSINT-041 Probabilistic Forecasting Dashboard
- [item submitted, not yet returned]