CONTINUOUS RESIDENTIAL THREAT MONITORING

This is a standing monitoring/watch subscription on a residential asset (primary residence, secondary property, or estate): it defines the watch criteria/tripwires for physical and digital threats, the collection and reporting cadence, the escalation routes, and the service levels under which we keep the client current over the term. It does NOT cover the one-off baseline threat assessment that seeds the watch list (Residential Threat Assessment), nor any staffed operational detail (residential security detail / estate protection team / residential GSOC staffing - the staffed retained-service archetype). Prescriptive throughout: this is what we watch, how often, and what we do when a tripwire fires - not an analytic estimate of the residence’s threat environment.

Document Control

FieldValue
Service name[ ]
DIDOSINT-045
Residential asset / monitoring target[ ]
Client / sponsor[ ]
Classification & handling[e.g., classification + caveats + dissemination control]
Version[ ]
Author / service owner[ ]
Effective date[ ]
Term / period of performance[e.g., start–end, auto-renew terms]
Seeding product (baseline)[e.g., reference to the OSINT-043 threat assessment that establishes the watch list]

Scope, Authorities & Limitations

State the authorized scope (which residential asset, which lawful source lanes, which collection methods), the engagement authority/consent basis, and what is explicitly out of scope; reproduce the verbatim caveats below; name the sibling products this service routes to.

This is a monitoring/operational service, not an investigation, a guarantee of detection, or legal advice. Collection is limited to lawful, authorized sources within the agreed scope; no unlawful access, intrusion, pretexting, or surveillance of non-consenting third parties is performed. Alerting is best-effort within the stated SLA and does not warrant prevention of any event.

BoundaryStatement
In scope[ ]
Out of scope[ ]
Authority / consent basis[ ]
Routes to (seeding product)[e.g., OSINT-043 Pre-Travel/Residential Threat Assessment]
Routes to (staffed services)[e.g., residential security detail / estate protection team / GSOC staffing sibling]

1. Scope & Watch Criteria / Tripwires

Enumerate every watch item (physical/digital threats, media exposure, asset visibility, threat-actor chatter, adverse-media, exposure events); per the load-bearing rule each row MUST bind a tripwire (the observable threshold that fires it), implicitly a cadence (§2), and an escalation route (§4). Risk-score each watch item with the L×I key reproduced in §4. No row may omit a tripwire or an escalation route.

#Watch itemObservable indicatorTripwire thresholdLikelihood (1–5)Impact (1–5)L×I (1–25)Severity tierEscalation route (→ §4)
[ ][ ][ ][e.g., the threshold/condition that fires the alert][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]

2. Collection Cadence & Sources

Specify each lawful collection lane keyed to the watch items above, its method, its collection cadence, the expected source grade (Admiralty, see Annex A), and the owning collector. Free/browser-first lanes before escalation-tier platforms; no live tool names here - describe the lane.

Source / laneWatch item(s) servedCollection methodCadenceExpected source grade (Admiralty)Owner
[ ][ ][e.g., description of the lawful collection method][e.g., continuous / hourly / daily / weekly][e.g., A–F × 1–6][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]

3. Reporting Cadence & Product Format

Define each recurring product the service emits, what triggers it (scheduled cadence or tripwire-driven), its format, recipient, and delivery channel. Distinguish the routine cadence product from the on-tripwire alert product.

ProductTrigger / cadenceFormatRecipientChannel
[e.g., routine periodic summary][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., tripwire alert][e.g., on tripwire fire, per §1][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., periodic service-health report][ ][ ][ ][ ]

4. Escalation & Notification Triggers

Map severity tiers to trigger conditions, the party notified, the notification method, and the acknowledgement target. Each tier must correspond to severity bands derived from the L×I key below; every §1 watch item routes to a tier here.

Risk scoring key (reproduce verbatim): Likelihood (1–5) × Impact (1–5) = 1–25; 1–5 Low · 6–10 Moderate · 11–15 Elevated · 16–20 High · 21–25 Critical.

Severity tierL×I bandTrigger conditionNotifyMethodAcknowledgement target
[e.g., Critical][e.g., 21–25][ ][ ][ ][e.g., time-to-acknowledge target]
[e.g., High][e.g., 16–20][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., Elevated][e.g., 11–15][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., Moderate/Low][e.g., 1–10][ ][ ][ ][ ]

5. Service Levels (SLA)

Bind measurable service-level commitments to the cadence (§2/§3) and escalation timing (§4): detection/refresh timeliness, alert-delivery time per tier, product-delivery punctuality, availability, and the remedy when a target is missed. Every target must be measurable and have a measurement method.

MetricTargetMeasurement methodReportedRemedy / credit on miss
[e.g., alert delivery time by tier][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., routine product punctuality][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., monitoring availability / coverage][ ][ ][ ][ ]
[e.g., false-positive / quality bound][ ][ ][ ][ ]

6. Review & Renewal

State the cadence of formal service review, the change-control process for adding/removing watch items or adjusting cadence, and the renewal, re-scoping, and termination terms.

ItemSpecification
Service-review cadence[ ]
Watch-list change-control[e.g., process to add/retire a §1 watch item]
Cadence / scope adjustment process[ ]
Renewal terms[ ]
Termination / offboarding terms[ ]

Annex A - Source & Watch-List Register (graded)

Register every standing source and watch item with its current Admiralty grade. Reproduce the scales verbatim; grade each sourced datum as a two-character code (e.g., B2).

NATO Admiralty source reliability (A–F): A Completely reliable · B Usually reliable · C Fairly reliable · D Not usually reliable · E Unreliable · F Reliability cannot be judged. NATO Admiralty information credibility (1–6): 1 Confirmed by other sources · 2 Probably true · 3 Possibly true · 4 Doubtful · 5 Improbable · 6 Truth cannot be judged.

Source / watch itemLane (→ §2)Reliability (A–F)Credibility (1–6)GradeLast verifiedNotes
[ ][ ][ ][ ][e.g., B2][ ][ ]
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]

Annex B - Onboarding / Offboarding & Data-Handling Checklist

Capture the standing-up and tearing-down steps and the data-handling regime over the term: authorization capture, baseline ingest, collection standup, retention/destruction, and offboarding.

StepPhaseOwnerStatus
[e.g., capture authority/consent + scope sign-off][e.g., onboarding][ ][ ]
[e.g., ingest seeding baseline (OSINT-043)][e.g., onboarding][ ][ ]
[e.g., stand up collection lanes + tripwires][e.g., onboarding][ ][ ]
[e.g., data retention / destruction schedule][e.g., steady-state][ ][ ]
[e.g., offboarding + data return/purge][e.g., offboarding][ ][ ]

END OF SERVICE PLAYBOOK

Model wiring

Generated from cell frontmatter at publish time.