[SUBJECT FULL NAME] - Collection Map
OSINT-002 Enhanced Deep-Dive Subject Investigation - collection workspace. Central topic = the subject. Branches = data-point categories for a maximum-depth, multi-jurisdictional investigation. Drop each collected value as a child node; expand it with where it was found and what it links to. Paste raw tool output into the node’s Notes. → feeds deliverable OSINT-002. This is an escalation product above OSINT-001; it carries collection-tier tracking, beneficial-ownership mapping, source-of-wealth reconstruction, extended (2nd/3rd-degree) network risk analysis, human-source reputation findings, and deception/concealment analysis. Scope out: threat scoring (→ OSINT-004), forensic asset recovery, skip-trace (→ OSINT-003), approach/elicitation strategy (→ OSINT-005).
00 · Collection Plan - PIRs & EEIs
The driving intelligence requirements for this deep-dive. Each PIR maps to deliverable sections. Tick EEIs as satisfied. Carry open items to §19 Collection Gaps & Intelligence Requirements and §99 Admin. → feeds §3 Key Judgments, §4 PIRs, §14 Verified Findings, §15 Red Flags, §19 Gaps.
PIR-1 - Identity: is the subject uniquely and fully resolved?
- EEI: full legal name + DOB/place of birth confirmed in primary records
- EEI: all former legal names / AKAs / maiden name / transliterations identified
- EEI: acquired / second citizenships identified
- EEI: government / national IDs obtained (lawfully, redacted per policy)
- EEI: same-name candidates identified and excluded with documented basis
- EEI: identity anomalies or deliberate manipulation indicators assessed (→ §13)
PIR-2 - Biographic & career: is the self-reported history accurate and complete?
- EEI: employment history verified to each institution / employer
- EEI: education credentials verified to each institution
- EEI: professional licenses / military / government service confirmed
- EEI: claimed vs. verified discrepancies catalogued (→ §13 Master Discrepancy Matrix)
- EEI: family background / domestic relationships documented
PIR-3 - Corporate interests & beneficial ownership: what entities does the subject own, control, or benefit from?
- EEI: named directorships / officer roles identified in all in-scope jurisdictions
- EEI: UBO / nominee / trust structures mapped (including offshore)
- EEI: shared infrastructure across entities noted
- EEI: control vs. economic interest distinguished per entity
PIR-4 - Source of wealth: is the declared wealth narrative plausible and substantiated?
- EEI: all stated wealth events (business sale, inheritance, salary, etc.) identified and assessed
- EEI: wealth plausibility tested against known/claimed income and career
- EEI: real property (multi-jurisdiction) located via registries
- EEI: high-value movable assets (vessels, aircraft, art) checked in registries
- EEI: financial-stress / adverse indicators (liens, judgments, insolvency) identified
- EEI: hidden / nominee asset indicators surfaced (→ §13)
PIR-5 - Network & associations (extended): who are the subject’s key relationships and what risk do they carry?
- EEI: 1st-degree associates (family, business, social) identified and relationship characterized
- EEI: 2nd-degree risk nodes (PEP, sanctions, criminal, COI adjacency) identified
- EEI: 3rd-degree examined where warranted by risk or hidden-relationship indicators
- EEI: undisclosed relationships surfaced
- EEI: sanctions / PEP proximity quantified per node
PIR-6 - Reputation, integrity & conduct: what do documentary record and discreet human-source inquiry reveal?
- EEI: documentary reputation findings collated (media, regulatory, court narrative)
- EEI: human-source reputation reporting obtained and graded per sub-source
- EEI: integrity / conduct synthesis produced with corroboration level stated
PIR-7 - Digital & dark-web footprint: what is the subject’s attributed online presence and exposure?
- EEI: all attributed accounts and identifiers collected and graded
- EEI: breach / credential exposure identified across known corpora
- EEI: dark-web mentions / forum / marketplace presence checked
- EEI: technical infrastructure (domains, email auth, pseudonymous identities) examined
PIR-8 - Legal, regulatory, sanctions & adverse media: what formal derogatory record exists across jurisdictions?
- EEI: criminal / court records checked in all in-scope jurisdictions
- EEI: civil litigation mapped (role, status, summary)
- EEI: regulatory / professional actions identified
- EEI: OFAC SDN, EU / UK / UN / other sanctions screened (date recorded)
- EEI: PEP status of subject and key associates screened
- EEI: adverse media collected in all collection languages, graded
PIR-9 - Deception, concealment & discrepancy: has the subject deliberately misrepresented or concealed material facts?
- EEI: Master Discrepancy Matrix populated from all sections
- EEI: concealment indicators (hidden assets, identity engineering, structural opacity) synthesised
- EEI: deception assessment produced with likelihood and confidence stated separately
Collection gaps / RFIs (running)
- [open gap] → route to [product / §19]
- [open gap]
01 · Identity & Biographic
Who the subject is, verified vs. self-reported. Establish unique resolution at maximum depth - former names, acquired citizenships, breeder documents, and any identity anomalies that carry to §13. → feeds §5 Subject Identification & Identity Resolution, §6 Comprehensive Biographic & Career History.
Names
- Full legal name:
- Middle name / initial:
- Maiden / former legal name(s):
- AKA / aliases / nicknames:
- Transliterations / native script / romanisations:
Birth & nationality
- DOB / YOB:
- Place of birth:
- Nationality / citizenship(s) - primary:
- Acquired / second citizenship(s):
- Country:
- Basis (naturalisation / investment / descent):
- Date:
- Source grade:
- Government / national ID (lawfully obtained, redacted):
Physical description
- Description:
- Distinguishing features:
- Languages spoken:
Career chronology (high-level; detail under §06)
- [Employer / role / dates - current]:
- [Employer / role / dates - prior]:
Biographic anomalies / claimed vs. verified flags
- [anomaly / discrepancy]:
- Type: [Omission / Overstatement / Fabrication / Unverifiable]
- Carry to §13: [Y/N]
02 · Contact & Selectors
Pivot core - the selectors that link records across systems and jurisdictions. Every value cloneable. → feeds §5 Subject Identification & Identity Resolution, §11 Digital, Technical & Dark Web Footprint.
Phone numbers
→ feeds §5, §11. Clone block per number. ← (truecaller, caller-ID lookups, carrier/CNAM)
- [number - e.g. +1 555-0142]
- Type / carrier: [mobile / landline / VoIP]
- Jurisdiction / country code:
- Linked accounts / apps:
- Where found (source + URL):
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
- Notes / tool output:
- [number 2]
Email addresses
→ feeds §5, §11. Clone block per address. ← (holehe, h8mail, hunter.io, breach corpora)
- [email]
- Linked accounts (account discovery):
- Breach / paste appearances:
- Human-source / gated-DB hits:
- Where found (source + URL):
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
- Notes / tool output:
- [email 2]
Usernames / handles
→ feeds §5, §11. Clone block per handle. ← (idcrawl, sherlock, whatsmyname)
- [handle - e.g. jdoe_biz]
- Platforms / where found (URL):
- Linked email(s):
- Linked phone(s):
- Other accounts reusing it:
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
- Notes / tool output:
- [handle 2]
03 · Addresses & Locations
Multi-jurisdiction. Every address graded. Known vs. assessed vs. historical. → feeds §5 Subject Identification & Identity Resolution, §8 Source-of-Wealth (property indicators).
Current address(es)
- [address]
- Jurisdiction:
- Dates associated:
- Basis / source:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
Previous / historical addresses
- [address]
- Jurisdiction:
- Dates:
- Source:
Other associated locations (work / business premises / frequented)
- [location]
- Type: [Work / Registered-entity office / Frequented / Travel hub]
- Basis:
04 · Digital Footprint
Full attributed online presence: social, forums, domains, breach exposure, dark-web. Carry deep-web and dark-web findings here; technical infrastructure below. → feeds §11 Digital, Technical & Dark Web Footprint.
Social media accounts
Clone per platform. Grade attribution per account.
- [platform - Facebook / X / Instagram / LinkedIn / TikTok / Telegram / other]
- Handle / URL:
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
- Status: [Active / Dormant / Deleted]
- Content/affiliations of note:
- Notes:
Websites / personal domains
← (whois, ViewDNS, DomainTools, crt.sh, SecurityTrails)
- [domain]
- Registrant / WHOIS:
- Hosting / IP:
- Linked email in registration:
- Notes:
Forums / communities / specialist platforms
- [site + handle]:
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
Breach / paste / data-broker exposure
← (HaveIBeenPwned, dehashed, intelx, Snusbase; data-broker removals audit)
- [indicator - email / username / hash found in breach corpus]
- Source / corpus:
- Date of breach / observed:
- Data fields exposed:
- Significance:
Dark-web mentions
← (Ahmia, OnionSearch, Recon-ng dark-web modules, vendor-specific dark-web intel)
- [mention / forum thread / marketplace listing]
- Platform:
- Date observed:
- Substance:
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
Technical infrastructure & pseudonymous identities
- [domain / IP / hosting asset / pseudonym]
- Link to subject:
- Backdating / age-vs-claim indicator:
- Notes:
05 · Network & Associations
Extended mapping: 1st, 2nd, and (where warranted) 3rd degree. Each node risk-coded. Carry beneficial-ownership overlaps to §07. Carry PEP / sanctions-proximity nodes to §12. → feeds §9 Network & Association Analysis (Extended).
Family & household
- [name]
- Relationship:
- DOB / nationality:
- Known affiliations / risk indicators:
- Basis / source:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
Business / professional associates (1st degree)
- [name]
- Relationship:
- Shared entity / interest:
- Risk relevance: [PEP / Sanctions / Criminal / COI / Reputational / None]
- Risk score (1–25):
- Basis:
Business / professional associates (2nd degree)
- [name]
- Via (1st-degree intermediary):
- Relationship:
- Risk relevance:
- Risk score (1–25):
3rd-degree / warranted extended nodes
- [name / entity]
- Via chain:
- Trigger for inclusion:
- Risk relevance:
Social / personal associates
- [name]
- Relationship:
- Risk indicator:
Undisclosed / hidden relationships (indicators)
- [suspected link]
- Basis:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
- Carry to §13: [Y/N]
06 · Employment, Education & Affiliations
Verified vs. claimed. Divergences flag for §13 Deception / Discrepancy Analysis. Check employer registry status, institution accreditation, license databases. → feeds §6 Comprehensive Biographic & Career History, §13 Deception Analysis.
Employment - current
- [employer]
- Role / title:
- Dates:
- Verified via:
- Status: [Verified / Claimed / Contradicted]
Employment - prior (clone per role)
- [employer]
- Role / title:
- Dates:
- Verified via:
- Status: [Verified / Claimed / Contradicted]
- Discrepancy (if any):
Education (clone per institution)
← (institution registrar, accreditation bodies, degree-verification services)
- [institution]
- Credential / field / dates:
- Verified via:
- Status: [Verified / Claimed / Contradicted / Unverifiable]
Professional licenses & credentials
← (state / national / professional body registers)
- [license / credential]
- Issuing body:
- Status: [Active / Lapsed / Revoked]
- Verified:
Military / government / intelligence service
- [service / branch / role]
- Dates:
- Rank / grade:
- Verified:
Memberships / affiliations / boards
- [organisation / role]
- Dates:
- Significance:
07 · Corporate Interests & Beneficial Ownership
Entities the subject owns, controls, directs, or benefits from - named, nominee, and trust structures. Multi-jurisdiction. Distinguish control (voting/direction) vs. economic interest (dividends/UBO). → feeds §7 Corporate Interests & Beneficial Ownership, §9 Network, §8 Source-of-Wealth.
Named directorships / officer roles
← (OpenCorporates, Companies House, SEC EDGAR, national registries, regulatory filings)
- [entity name - e.g. Acme Holdings Ltd]
- Jurisdiction:
- Reg. # / company number:
- Subject’s role: [Director / Officer / Shareholder / Secretary]
- % ownership (if known):
- Dates active:
- Status: [Active / Dormant / Struck]
- Co-directors / co-owners:
- Source grade:
- Notes / tool output:
- [entity 2]
Beneficial ownership / UBO (behind nominees / trusts)
- [entity / structure name]
- Nominee(s) / trustee(s):
- Jurisdiction:
- Basis for UBO attribution:
- Control vs. economic interest:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
Offshore / opacity structures
- [structure / jurisdiction]
- Layering description:
- Shared infrastructure with other entities:
- Jurisdiction-shopping indicator:
Ownership / control diagram notes
- [diagram reference / description]:
08 · Source-of-Wealth & Financial Profile
How accumulated wealth was built (SoW - relational) and specific funds (SoF - transactional, where in scope). Test plausibility: does the narrative account for observed assets and lifestyle? OSINT + public-records depth only - forensic recovery routes to Financial Intelligence & Asset Tracing. → feeds §8 Source-of-Wealth & Financial Profile, §13 Concealment Indicators.
Wealth events / declared sources (clone per event)
- [wealth event - e.g. sale of TechCo, 2019]
- Period:
- Description:
- Claimed value:
- Substantiation: [Substantiated / Partial / Unsubstantiated]
- Source grade:
Real property (multi-jurisdiction)
← (land registries, deed records, HM Land Registry, county recorder, offshore land records)
- [property / address]
- Jurisdiction:
- Registered owner (nominee?):
- Acquisition date / price:
- Current estimated value:
- Basis / source:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
Corporate / equity interests (cross-ref §07)
- [entity]
- Subject’s stake / role:
- Estimated value:
- Registry source:
High-value movable assets
← (vessel registers / IMO / US CG NVDC, FAA / EASA / ICAO aircraft registers, art databases)
- [asset - vessel / aircraft / art / jewellery]
- Type:
- Registry / identifier:
- Registered owner:
- Estimated value:
- Basis:
Public financial filings
- [filing - e.g. UCC, beneficial-ownership register, political-donation disclosure]
- Source:
- Key data:
Observable lifestyle vs. known/claimed means
- [lifestyle indicator]
- Observation:
- Income plausibility: [Plausible / Gap / Unexplained]
Financial-stress / adverse indicators
- [lien / judgment / insolvency / adverse filing (public)]
- Jurisdiction:
- Date:
- Amount / substance:
- Source:
Hidden / undisclosed asset indicators
- [indicator of concealment]
- Basis:
- Carry to §13: [Y/N]
09 · Media & Imagery
Subject photographs, video, audio - sourced and metadata-checked. Feeds identity resolution, reverse-image attribution, and the evidence archive. → feeds §5 Subject Identification & Identity Resolution, §11 Digital Footprint, §22 Appendix F Evidence Archive.
Photos of subject
- [image ref / filename]
- Source / URL:
- Date:
- EXIF metadata:
- Reverse-image search results:
Avatar / profile picture(s)
- [image ref]
- Source:
- Reverse-image search locations:
- Attribution confidence: [Confirmed / Probable / Possible]
Video
- [file / URL]
- Source / platform:
- Date:
- Metadata:
Audio
- [file / URL]
- Source / notes:
10 · Reputation, Integrity & Conduct
Documentary record + discreet human-source inquiry. Human sources coded only - never named in collection workspace. Grade each sub-source for reliability (A–F) and each item for credibility (1–6). → feeds §10 Reputation, Integrity & Conduct Assessment.
Documentary reputation findings
- [outlet / document / source]
- Date:
- Substance:
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
Human-source / field reputation findings (clone per sub-source)
Sub-sources coded only - full identity in Source Protection Annex (Appendix A of deliverable).
- [sub-source code - e.g. SRC-1]
- Access / vantage point:
- Reporting summary:
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
- Corroboration status:
Integrity & conduct flags
- [flag / indicator]
- Domain: [Integrity / Conduct / Lifestyle / Professional]
- Corroboration level: [Single-source / Corroborated / Contradicted]
- Carry to §15 Red Flags: [Y/N]
11 · Legal & Derogatory
Comprehensive multi-jurisdiction scan. Charge vs. conviction vs. alleged - always distinguished. Date and grade every item; note record currency. → feeds §12 Legal, Regulatory, Sanctions & Adverse Media.
Criminal / court records (multi-jurisdiction)
- [matter - jurisdiction / case type / case #]
- Jurisdiction:
- Case #:
- Type: [Criminal / Civil / Regulatory]
- Status / disposition: [Charged / Convicted / Dismissed / Pending]
- Date:
- Summary:
- Source grade:
Civil litigation
- [case - jurisdiction / parties / case #]
- Role: [Plaintiff / Defendant / Third-party]
- Status:
- Summary:
- Source grade:
Regulatory & professional actions
- [action / regulator / date]:
- Status / outcome:
Sanctions, PEP & watchlist screening
- OFAC SDN / Consolidated: [Clear / Hit / Near-match]
- Date screened:
- Match quality:
- EU Consolidated List: [Clear / Hit / Near-match]
- Date screened:
- UK Financial Sanctions List: [Clear / Hit / Near-match]
- Date screened:
- UN Consolidated List: [Clear / Hit / Near-match]
- Date screened:
- PEP databases (subject): [Clear / Hit / Near-match]
- Database(s) used:
- Date screened:
- PEP databases (key associates):
- Law enforcement / Interpol public notices: [Clear / Hit]
- Date screened:
Adverse media (multi-language)
← (Factiva, LexisNexis, local-language press, GDELT, Google News advanced operators, translate tools)
- [outlet + date]
- Language:
- Substance:
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
12 · Pattern of Life
Open-source only - no covert or physical surveillance. Routine, geography, travel, anomalies. → feeds §6 Comprehensive Biographic & Career History (contextual), §8 Source-of-Wealth (lifestyle indicators).
Routine & temporal patterns
- [observed cadence / schedule indicator]
- Source / basis:
Geographic footprint
- [habitual location / jurisdiction]
- Frequency basis:
Travel & mobility
- [observed travel / visa indicators / departure records (public)]
- Period:
- Basis:
Anomalies / deviations
- [departure from established pattern]
- Date:
- Significance:
13 · Deception, Concealment & Discrepancy
Synthesise indicators of fabrication, concealment, and misrepresentation from all other branches. This is analysis, not accusation - grade and caveat every item. → feeds §13 Deception, Concealment & Discrepancy Analysis, §15 Red Flag Summary.
Master discrepancy log (clone per item; feed §13 table in deliverable)
- [discrepancy ref - D-1, D-2, …]
- Claimed / represented:
- Verified reality:
- Type: [Omission / Overstatement / Fabrication / Identity / Asset / Structural]
- Assessment: [Deliberate / Likely / Indeterminate / Innocent error]
- Supporting sections:
Concealment indicators
- [indicator type - e.g. nominee structure, identity gap, jurisdiction-shopping]
- Evidence basis:
- Confidence: [H/M/L]
Collection-tier exploitation for concealment detection
- [tier used / method]
- Gaps exploited / surfaced:
99 · Collection Admin
Working register - audit trail behind the deliverable. Not itself a deliverable section. Maps to §21 Sources & Methodology, §22 Appendices (A/D/F).
Source register
Every material datum traceable to a graded source. Human sub-sources by code only - full identity in Source Protection Annex.
- [S-1 - source name / description]
- Type: [Primary / Secondary / Tertiary / Human / Licensed-DB / Gated]
- Reliability (A–F):
- Credibility (1–6):
- Collection tier: [T1 / T2 / T3 / T4 / T5 / T6]
- Date accessed:
- Notes:
- [S-2]
- [S-3]
Evidence archive
- [screenshot / capture ref + SHA-256 hash + URL + timestamp]:
Collection-tier log
- T1 Open-source (OSINT): [engaged - tools / scope]
- T2 Licensed / gated databases & deep web: [engaged - databases / scope]
- T3 Multi-jurisdiction public records: [engaged - jurisdictions]
- T4 Foreign-language / in-country records: [engaged - languages / countries]
- T5 Human-source / discreet field inquiry: [engaged - type / coded sub-sources]
- T6 Technical / digital & dark web: [engaged - tools / scope]
Human-source code register (controlled)
Full identity → Source Protection Annex (Appendix A). Only coded entries here.
- SRC-1: [coded - access / vantage only]
- SRC-2:
Open gaps / RFIs (running)
- [gap description - what is needed, impact on assessment, priority]
- [item submitted to T5 human source - pending]
- [jurisdiction record not yet returned - routed to §19]
ACH / key assumptions working notes
- [assumption or hypothesis under test]:
Verification pending
- [item submitted - date - expected return]